MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404844013 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.013

Prototype Design and Experimental Test for A Hydraulic-Driven Soft Robotic Arm

2024· article· en· W4404844013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceTest (biology)Soft roboticsSimulationRobotic armHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft robotics has gained considerable attention in recent years for its structural flexibility and inherent safety in environmental interactions. To address the pitfalls of pneumatic actuation systems, namely sluggish response and inefficiencies, this paper introduces the design and fabrication of a Hydraulic-Driven Soft Robotic Arm (HDSRA). The study establishes a comprehensive platform that integrates actuation, sensing, and control software to provide an experimental prototype for validating control algorithms. A novel fabrication technique utilizing water-soluble PVA for single-step mold creation enhances the structural reliability of soft actuators. Through closed-loop control experiments, the HDSRA demonstrates rapid and precise tracking of 1Hz signals, encompassing sine, square, and ramp waves, thus confirming the platform's reliability. This foundational work lays a robust foundation for future research and the verification of control algorithms in HDSRAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it