MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404844758 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.021

Running and Steering Gait Generation Based on Double-Leg 3D-SLIP Model for Bipedal Robots

2024· article· en· W4404844758 on OpenAlexaff
Guifu Luo, Ruilong Du, Sumian Song, Haihui Yuan, Hua Zhou, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRobotGaitSlip (aerodynamics)SimulationArtificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) provides a bio-inspired perspective to generate stable, fast, and compliant gaits for bipedal robots. In this work, an improved decoupled control strategy was proposed to generate stable, fast, human-like, and practical 3D running and steering gaits for double-leg three-dimensional SLIP (3D-SLIP). In the sagittal plane, an approximate-SLIP- based deadbeat controller was introduced for forward velocity and running height tracking with low computational cost and a fast convergence rate. In the lateral plane, an alternating term was introduced to the footstep controller for imitating lateral swing and avoiding left and right leg collision. Simulations were conducted to verify the stability of the periodic running gait, to explore the tracking performance of the forward velocity with the proposed control strategy, and to generate agile and versatile running and steering gaits for bipedal robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207