MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404883841 · doi:10.1177/11769351241297493

Prediction of Distant Metastasis of Lymph-Node-Negative Primary Breast Cancer From Gene Expression Profiling Using Cox-Boost Regression Model

2024· article· en· W4404883841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerGene expression profilingProportional hazards modelProfiling (computer programming)MedicineOncologyLymph node metastasisLymph nodeDistant metastasisGene expressionInternal medicineMetastasisBioinformaticsComputational biologyGeneCancerBiologyComputer scienceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backgrounds: Distant metastasis in breast cancer patients contributes to increased breast cancer mortality, highlighting the urgent need for effective predictive strategies. Understanding metastasis mechanisms and identifying relevant biomarkers are crucial for improving patient outcomes and informing targeted therapies. This study employed a high-dimensional regression model to identify biomarkers linked to distant metastasis-free survival in breast cancer patients, with the goal of enhancing prognostic accuracy and guiding clinical decisions. Methods: We utilized the publicly available breast cancer dataset (GSE2034), which includes gene expression profiles for 22 283 genes across 286 samples. To identify relevant genes, we applied Cox-Boost regression and a random forest (RF) model. We then explored the association between the selected genes and metastasis-free survival outcomes using quantile regression, chosen for its ability to assess the impact of these genes across different survival quantiles ( P < .05). This approach complements the Cox-Boost model by providing a more detailed understanding of gene-survival relationships at various points in the survival distribution, thereby strengthening the robustness of our findings. Results: We identified 222 significant transcripts using univariate Cox regression models. By applying Cox-Boost, both with and without adjustment for ER+/− status, we identified 7 genes associated with time-to-relapse/metastasis in breast cancer patients: SNU13, CLINT1, ACBD3, NEK2, COL2A1, WFDC1, and RACGAP1. A similar approach was used for ER-positive patients. Patients were classified as high or low risk for metastasis based on the median prognostic index calculated from the identified genes ( P < .001). The top-ranked genes associated with high/low risk groups using RF were RACGAP1, NEK2, CCNA2, DTL, ACBD3, ARL6IP5, WFDC1, and PDCD4. Conclusions: We identified eleven key genes, including SNU13, CLINT1, ACBD3, NEK2, COL2A1, WFDC1, and RACGAP1, as well as CCNA2, DTL, ARL6IP5, and PDCD4, that are related to the risk of distant metastasis and may be used as biomarkers to predict distant metastasis of breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it