Serve Yourself! Federated Power Control for AI-Native 5G and Beyond
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adoption of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) in industries necessitates advancements in energy efficiency and latency reduction, especially for resource-constrained devices. Services require specific Quality of Service (QoS) levels to function properly, and meeting a threshold QoS can be sufficient for smooth connectivity, reducing the need to maximize perceived QoS due to energy concerns. This is modeled as a satisfactory game, aiming to find minimal power allocation to meet target demands. Due to environmental uncertainties, achieving a Robust Satisfactory Equilibrium (RSE) can be challenging, leading to less satisfaction. We propose a fully distributed, environment-aware power control scheme to enhance satisfaction in dynamic environments. The proposed Robust Banach-Picard (RBP) learning scheme combines deep learning and federated learning to overcome channel and interference impacts and accelerate convergence. Extensive simulations evaluate the scheme under varying channel states and QoS demands, with discussions on convergence speed, energy efficiency, scalability, complexity, and violation rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it