MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404937953 · doi:10.1080/07924259.2024.2434088

Evidence of brood parasitism in the sea anemone <i>Aulactinia stella</i>

2024· article· en· W4404937953 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean-François Hamel, Kathryn Murray, Bárbara de Moura Neves, Annie Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenueInvertebrate Reproduction & Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySea anemoneParasitismBrood parasiteBroodAnemoneJellyfishEcologyZoologyHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring of the sea anemone Aulactinia stella over several weeks provided evidence of interindividual reciprocal tentacle contacts. Closer examination of images revealed instances where a tentacle either hovered over or entered the mouth of a conspecific and remained there for minutes to hours. These observations align with previous data on reproductive and offspring biology in the same species to suggest deliberate transfer of larvae and/or juveniles across individuals, which would explain how genetically different offspring can be found in brooding females according to the literature. This unique interaction between conspecific sea anemones shows striking similarities with the intraspecific brood parasitism tactics described in insects and birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvertebrate Reproduction & DevelopmentSame topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207