MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404937953 · doi:10.1080/07924259.2024.2434088

Evidence of brood parasitism in the sea anemone <i>Aulactinia stella</i>

2024· article· en· W4404937953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInvertebrate Reproduction & Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySea anemoneParasitismBrood parasiteBroodAnemoneJellyfishEcologyZoologyHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring of the sea anemone Aulactinia stella over several weeks provided evidence of interindividual reciprocal tentacle contacts. Closer examination of images revealed instances where a tentacle either hovered over or entered the mouth of a conspecific and remained there for minutes to hours. These observations align with previous data on reproductive and offspring biology in the same species to suggest deliberate transfer of larvae and/or juveniles across individuals, which would explain how genetically different offspring can be found in brooding females according to the literature. This unique interaction between conspecific sea anemones shows striking similarities with the intraspecific brood parasitism tactics described in insects and birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it