MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404991528 · doi:10.5593/sgem2024/3.1/s13.33

PHYTOSTABLIZATION OF SULPHIDE MINE TAILINGS

2024· article· en· W4404991528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM ... · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsMining engineeringGeologyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orphaned or abandoned sulphide tailing disposal sites pose significant environmental hazards, including eolian dispersion, water erosion, acid mine drainage, and heavy metal mobility. Phytostabilization, an eco-friendly strategy, entails the use of alkaline amendments alongside non-native plant species capable of thriving in environments with high concentrations of heavy metals. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to assess the effect of a commercial cement which contained 46.3% sand, applied alone or combined with three magnesium (Mg) reagents on the shoot dry yield (DMY) of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) grown on sulphide mine tailings (SMT) (pH 3.0). The 29 treatments evaluated were replicated three times in a randomized complete block design. All pots received N-P-K fertilizer. Treatments combining cement and Mg reagents significantly increased the pH of the cultivated tailings. Magnesium oxide (MgO) and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)?), when mixed with the cement, were more effective than magnesium carbonate (MgCO?) in maintaining alkaline conditions in the cultivated tailings. The pH increase was notably higher in cultivated tailing samples treated with cement+MgO, reaching pH levels ranging from 4.93 to 7.58. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant effect of the cement+Mg reagents on the DMY of ryegrass. There was a strong correlation between substrate pH and DMY (r = 0.853, p less than 0.001), with a quadratic regression equation providing the best fit to the data (R? = 0.894, p less than 0.001). In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of an 8% cement combined with 2% MgO for tailing revegetation or cultivation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it