Complex network control and stability through distributed critic‐based neuro‐fuzzy learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inspired by advancements in swarm autonomous vehicles and intelligent control systems, this research addresses the issue of frequency synchronization and phase tracking in oscillator networks. A novel distributed consensus protocol and a reinforcement learning algorithm for a multi‐agent network with a leader–follower topology, considering stability conditions, are developed. The critic‐based neuro‐fuzzy learning (CBNFL) method aims to achieve consensus and minimize local tracking errors. Additionally, an explicit synchronization condition for the network using the Lyapunov theorem is derived. Each vehicle tracks its reference phase and frequency. Employing a fuzzy critic to evaluate the current state and generate a stress signal for the controller, the method prompts adaptive parameter adjustments to minimize this signal. The proposed design's versatility and adaptability to various networks demonstrate robustness against dynamic vehicle properties and network parameter uncertainties, ensuring consistent controller performance. This approach exhibits high scalability, accommodating numerous autonomous agents. To validate the proposed learning method's efficacy, numerical simulations are conducted on a network of five oscillators. The outcomes of implementing CBNFL compared with a conventional PI controller underscore the CBNFL method's superior performance and robustness in maintaining network stability and achieving synchronization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it