MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405039826 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-194441

Improvement in Quality of Life in MDS Patients Who Become Transfusion Independent after Treatment

2024· article· en· W4405039826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityMcMaster UniversitySt. Paul's HospitalDr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreMPB Technologies & Communications (Canada)University of AlbertaBaker Hughes (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of ManitobaJuravinski Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood transfusionQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) generally experience inferior quality of life (QOL), in part due to transfusion dependent-anemia and. Many studies have shown that patients who are transfusion dependent (TD) typically have worse QOL compared to patients who are transfusion independent (TI), but the impact of achieving TI once TD on patient QOL is uncertain. MDS-CAN is a prospective multicentre Canadian registry that captures longitudinal clinical and QOL ‘real-world’ data in patients with MDS. We used the MDS-CAN registry to provide additional insight into the association between changes in transfusion status (i.e., from TD to TI, or from TI to TD) or stability of transfusion state (TI and TD) with overall survival (OS) and QOL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion status over time and examined its impact on OS and patient reported outcomes in patients prospectively enrolled in the MDS-CAN registry (NCT02537990). In brief, enrollment started in 2006 and included patients who were ≥ 18 years old with a diagnosis of MDS, MDS/MPN, or low blast count AML (20-30%). The four transfusion groups were defined as TD to TI (Group A), TI to TD (Group B), and maintaining TD (Group C) or TI (Group D). We obtained data on demographics, disease, function, frailty, laboratory parameters, as well as longitudinal data on treatment, transfusions, and patient-related health outcomes using validated instruments assessing QOL. The earliest QOL score obtained after initiation of treatment was considered the baseline for each patient. In group A and B, this was compared to the QOL score obtained at the first instance after a change in transfusion status. To be consistent, the median time to change in transfusion status in group A and B was used to select the comparator QOL time point in groups C and D. Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test, Chi-square or Fisher exact test were applied to compare continuous or categorical demographic and treatment characteristics, as appropriate. A general linear mixed model was used to identify significant associations between QOL scores and the 4 transfusion health states. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves from diagnosis were conducted in each of the four groups (A, B, C, and D), in patients treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA), and in patients treated with erythropoietin stimulating agonist (ESA). Results: Of 1120 patients included from the MDS-CAN registry, 759 were treated with either an HMA, lenalidomide or ESA. Longitudinal QOL analysis of the 656 patients who received treatment and provided serial QOL data included 54, 151, 126, and 326 patients in groups A-D, respectively. Overall QOL significantly improved in Group A, with trends towards improved component scores in physical and social function. In Group B, there were significant decreases from baseline to the first QOL after TD across multiple QOL measures on several instruments including worse global QOL, worse fatigue as well as worse physical, role, and social functioning. Group C had significantly more fatigue; group D had significant but milder deteriorations across global QOL, fatigue, physical and role functioning. Survival curves for all registry patients (n=1120) and the HMA-treated cohort (n=427) demonstrated superior OS in patients in group D. This was followed by groups A and B with similar OS to each other and was the lowest in group C (p<0.001 for both curves). These differences in OS were observed after 36 months of follow up. There were no differences in survival between the four groups among those who received ESA. Conclusion: Patients with MDS receiving treatment who achieved TI had improvements in patient-reported overall QOL but not in all individual metrics. Loss of TI was associated with a greater negative impact on overall QOL, with significance extending across multiple domains of physical, role, and emotional function. Among patients who remained TI, there was a trend of gradually reduced QOL over time. Patients who remained TI had superior OS, and patients who remained TD had inferior OS. There was intermediate OS in patients who had a change in transfusion status of either direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it