Efficient Dynamic Resource Management for Spatial Multitasking GPUs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advent of microservice architecture enables complex cloud applications to be realized via a set of individually isolated components, increasing their flexibility and performance. As these applications require massive computing resources, graphics processing units (GPUs) are being widely used as high-speed parallel computing devices to meet the stringent demands. Although current GPUs allow application components to be executed concurrently via spatial multitasking, they face several challenges. The first challenge is allocating the computing resources to components dynamically to maximize efficiency. The second challenge is avoiding performance degradation caused by the data transfer overhead between the components. To address these challenges, we propose an efficient GPU resource management technique that dynamically allocates GPU resources to application components. The proposed method allocates resources based on component workloads and uses online performance monitoring to guarantee the application's performance. We also propose a GPU memory manager to reduce the data transfer overhead between components via shared memory. Our evaluation results indicate that the proposed dynamic resource allocation method improves application throughput by up to 134.12% compared to the state-of-the-art spatial multitasking techniques. We also show that using a shared memory results in 6x throughput improvement compared to the baseline User Datagram Protocol (UDP)-based technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it