MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405099164 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16274

Individual-level Dietary Manipulation for Optimizing Mass Rearing of the Edible Cricket Gryllodes sigillatus

2024· dissertation· en· W4405099164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacsEntomological Society of Canada
KeywordsCricketAgricultureYield (engineering)BiologyBiotechnologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insects, a sustainable and nutritious alternative protein source, are one potential solution to mitigating food insecurity.North America and Europe are currently experiencing the rapid development of the insects as food and feed industry, with some companies focused on farming crickets for human food and agricultural feed.Increasing yield is a primary goal of agricultural research.Yield is a measurement of product harvested per unit area, and cricket farms struggle with how best to do this at a scale of billions of crickets required for a farming environment without the costs of additional labour.I argue that yield can be thought of as a function of survival and body size at and development time to adulthood.In this thesis, I have used a multifaceted approach to explore how diet can manipulate growth, development time to adulthood, and survival of Gryllodes sigillatus.My findings revealed that a 15% dietary supplementation with royal jelly elicited a sex-specific increase in mass; females fed the royal jelly diet were 30% heavier, and this effect was driven by significantly longer abdomens containing 67% more eggs compared to those fed the basal diet.I also demonstrate that manipulation of protein and carbohydrate availability can optimize growth and development of G. sigillatus; yield was maximized on a 3P:1C diet, as crickets fed this diet were most likely to develop into adults and grew maximum mass and body size.Similarly, I show that the physical attributes of diet can also exert strong influences on life history; crickets fed a large particle size diet grew larger and heavier faster compared to crickets fed a small particle size diet, and crickets also demonstrated a preference for medium and large size diet throughout development.Finally, I present the first recorded results detailing the pest-beneficial interactions between dermestids and farmed crickets; crickets experienced delayed growth early in life after living with dermestids, but crickets can tolerate living with, and consuming, dermestid larvae.Overall, my findings suggest iii that dietary supplementation, macronutrient ratio, diet particle size, and pest interactions all contribute to variation in cricket life history traits important to production yield.Thank you to my co-advisors, Heath and Sue, for such a truly enjoyable research experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect Utilization and EffectsFrench-language works237,207