MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405099330 · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117622

Gradient projection method for enforcing crack irreversibility as box constraints in a robust monolithic phase-field scheme

2024· article· en· W4405099330 on OpenAlexafffund
Tao Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Phase (matter)Field (mathematics)Projection (relational algebra)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematicsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysisAlgorithmControl (management)Pure mathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A phase-field monolithic scheme based on the gradient projection method is developed to model crack propagation in brittle materials under cyclic loading. As a type of active set method, the gradient projection method is particularly attractive to enforce the irreversibility condition imposed on the phase-field variables as bound constraints , or box constraints. This method has the advantages of allowing the rapid change of active constraints during iterations and computing the projected gradient with a negligible cost. The gradient projection method is further combined with the limited-memory BFGS (L-BFGS) method to overcome the convergence difficulties arising from the non-convex energy functional. A compact representation of the BFGS matrix is adopted as the limited-memory feature to avoid the storage of fully dense matrices, making this method practical for large-scale finite element simulations . By locating the generalized Cauchy point on the piecewise linear path formed by the projected gradient, the active set of box constraints can be determined. The variables in the active set, which are at the boundary of the box constraints, are kept fixed to form a subspace minimization problem . A primal approach and a dual approach are presented to solve this subspace minimization problem for the remaining free variables at the generalized Cauchy point. Several two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) examples are provided to demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed monolithic scheme, particularly in enforcing the phase-field irreversibility during crack propagation under cyclic loading. In these numerical examples, the proposed monolithic scheme is combined with an adaptive mesh refinement technique to alleviate the heavy computational cost incurred by the fine mesh resolution required around the crack region. The proposed method is further compared with two other phase-field solving techniques regarding the convergence behavior. To ensure a fair comparison, the same problem settings and implementation techniques are adopted. The proposed monolithic scheme provides a unified framework to overcome the numerical difficulties associated with the non-convex energy functional, effectively enforce the phase-field irreversibility to ensure the thermodynamic consistency, and alleviate the heavy computational cost through adaptive mesh refinement in 2D and 3D phase-field crack simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207