MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405109538 · doi:10.1680/jenes.23.00104

Trend analysis and learning-based groundwater level modelling over a tropical river basin

2024· article· en· W4405109538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterDrainage basinEnvironmental scienceStructural basinHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeographyGeologyCartographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groundwater trend analysis and modelling is challenging due to partially explicable factors and unexplained human influence. The Hurst index, sequential Mann–Kendall, and classical Mann–Kendall test offer a comprehensive groundwater trend analysis. A learning-based approach is developed to model groundwater levels using climatological variables of rainfall and temperature. Twenty-four locations were considered over Periyar river basin of Kerala, India, for the years 1996–2019, and during January, April, August, and November (JAAN) months. Significant trends were observed at 14 locations in at least one of the JAAN months, which is about 58%. Of these, eight locations exhibited positive trend, signalling a decline in groundwater supplies. The developed model yielded notable improvements in precision with 50%, 79%, 75%, and 83% of the locations in month-wise order. To gauge the model performance, observed and predicted location clusters obtained using k-means clustering are juxtaposed for the years 2017–2019, on both individual and average basis. This assessment indicated only one well transitioning in August, with the average approach resulting in a closer match to the original clustering for most of the wells. These findings will benefit future stakeholders and policymakers in optimising resource management strategies over the basin and wider.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it