A robust single-machine scheduling problem with scenario-dependent processing times and release dates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many uncertainties arise during the manufacturing process, such as changes in the working environment, traffic transportation delays, machine breakdowns, and worker performance instabilities. These factors can cause job processing times and ready times to change. In this study, we address a scheduling model for a single machine where both job release dates and processing times are scenario dependent. The objective is to minimize the total completion time across the worst-case scenarios. Even without the uncertainty factor, this problem is NP-hard. To solve it, we derive several properties and a lower bound used in a branch-and-bound method to find an optimal solution. We propose nine heuristics based on a linear combination of scenario-dependent processing times and release times for approximate solutions. Additionally, we offer an iterated greedy population-based algorithm that efficiently solves this problem by taking advantage of the diversity of solutions. We evaluate the performance of the proposed nine heuristics and the iterated greedy population-based algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it