Technique Analysis for Multilayer Perceptrons to Deal with Concept Drift in Data Streams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim/Purpose: This paper describes how to use a multilayer perceptron to improve concept drift recovery in streaming environments. Background: Classifying instances in a data stream environment with concept drift is a challenging topic. The base learner must be adapted online to the current data. Several data mining algorithms have been adapted/used to this type of environment. In this study, two techniques are used to speed up the adaptation of an artificial neural network to the current data, increasing its predictive accuracy while detecting the concept drift sooner. Methodology: Experiments were performed to analyze how some techniques behave in different scenarios and compare them with other classifiers built to deal with data streams and concept drifts. Contribution: This study suggests two techniques to improve the classification results: an embedded concept drift detection method to identify when a change has occurred and setting the learning rate to a higher level whenever a new concept is being learned to give more weight to recent instances, with its value decreased over time. Findings: Results indicate that gradually reducing the learning rate with an embedded concept drift detector has better statistical results than other single classifiers built to deal with data streams and concept drifts. Recommendations for Practitioners: Based on the empirical results, this study provides recommendations on how to improve the multilayer perceptron in data stream environments suffering from concept drifts. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers should conduct investigations to increase the number of base classifiers used in data stream environments and in situations where concept drifts occur. Impact on Society: The objective of this study is to increase the use of multilayer perceptrons in data stream environments suffering from concept drifts, as nowadays, Hoeffding Trees and Naive Bayes are the base classifiers mostly used. Future Research: Additional research includes adapting the online learning rate by increasing/decreasing it based on the performance of the Multilayer Perceptron. This scheme would allow the removal of parameters that must be set by the user, like learning rate upper bound and number of instances to return to the stable value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".