MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405205315 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2024.3514452

A Scalable Architecture for Future Regenerative Satellite Payloads

2024· article· en· W4405205315 on OpenAlexafffund
Olfa Ben Yahia, Zineb Garroussi, Brunilde Sansò, Jean‐François Frigon, Stéphane Martel, Antoine Lesage‐Landry, Güneş Karabulut Kurt

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsC-Com Satellite Systems (Canada)Polytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec
KeywordsComputer scienceSatelliteScalabilityArchitectureSatellite broadcastingComputer architectureDistributed computingAstrobiologyAerospace engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter addresses the limitations of current satellite payload architectures, which are predominantly hardware-driven and lack the flexibility to adapt to increasing data rate demands and uneven traffic. We propose a novel architecture for regenerative and programmable satellite payloads to overcome these challenges, utilizing interconnected modem banks to enhance scalability and flexibility. We formulate an optimization problem to efficiently manage traffic among these modem banks and balance the load. Additionally, we provide numerical simulation results, focusing on end-to-end delay and packet loss analysis. The results illustrate that our proposed architecture maintains lower delays and packet losses even with higher traffic demands and smaller buffer sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207