Visual culture and the politics of humanitarian consumption: The case of the Biafran gambit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photographs of the Biafran famine (1967–70) present, as subjects, emaciated women and children; artefacts used to substantiate colonial stereotypes about Africa as an impoverished continent. Despite this, Biafran leaders commissioned the reproduction of such visuals to galvanize the western public. Through the Swiss public relations company Markpress, the Biafran elite waged a far-reaching media campaign, publicizing the famine and incurring support for their secessionist war against Nigeria. This strategy evinces Black agency and exemplifies a crucial historical moment in which Africans retooled atrocity imagery for a purportedly emancipatory project. The first part of this article examines Biafran state ideology through a reading of the Ahiara Declaration and Chinua Achebe’s poetry, establishing an anti-imperialist orientation to the secessionist movement. The second part analyses more closely the humanitarian response to Biafran images, arguing that Biafran leaders exploited western sentiments as a wartime strategy in a bid for their budding nation’s survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".