MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405218847 · doi:10.2196/65734

Home Automated Telemanagement System for Individualized Exercise Programs: Design and Usability Evaluation

2024· article· en· W4405218847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Biomedical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsPreprintUsabilityComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Exercise is essential for physical rehabilitation, helping to improve functional performance and manage chronic conditions. Telerehabilitation offers an innovative way to deliver personalized exercise programs remotely, enhancing patient adherence and clinical outcomes. The Home Automated Telemanagement (HAT) System, integrated with the interactive bike (iBikE) system, was designed to support home-based rehabilitation by providing patients with individualized exercise programs that can be monitored remotely by a clinical rehabilitation team. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the design, usability, and efficacy of the iBikE system within the HAT platform. We assessed the system's ability to enhance patient adherence to prescribed exercise regimens while minimizing patient and clinician burden in carrying out the rehabilitation program. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study with 5 participants using a pre- and posttest design. Usability testing included 2 primary tasks that participants performed with the iBikE system. Task completion times, adherence to exercise protocols, and user satisfaction were measured. A System Usability Scale (SUS) was also used to evaluate participants' overall experience. After an initial introduction, users performed the tasks independently following a 1-week break to assess retention of the system's operation skills and its functionality. RESULTS: Task completion times improved substantially from the pretest to the posttest: execution time for task 1 reduced from a mean of 8.6 (SD 4.7) seconds to a mean of 1.8 (SD 0.8) seconds, and the time for task 2 decreased from a mean of 315 (SD 6.9) seconds to a mean of 303.4 (SD 1.1) seconds. Adherence to the prescribed cycling speed also improved, with deviations from the prescribed speed reduced from a mean of 6.26 (SD 1.00) rpm (revolutions per minute) to a mean of 4.02 (SD 0.82) rpm (t=3.305, n=5, P=.03). SUS scores increased from a mean of 92 (SD 8.6) to a mean of 97 (SD 3.3), indicating high user satisfaction and confidence in system usability. All participants successfully completed both tasks without any additional assistance during the posttest phase, demonstrating the system's ease of use and effectiveness in supporting independent exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The iBikE system, integrated into the HAT platform, effectively supports home-based telerehabilitation by enabling patients to follow personalized exercise prescriptions with minimal need for further training or supervision. The significant improvements in task performance and exercise adherence suggest that the system is well-suited for use in home-based rehabilitation programs, promoting sustained patient engagement and adherence to exercise regimens. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits of the system in broader patient populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it