MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405222131 · doi:10.1093/crj/clae017

The meaning of Mr. Tumnus: classical epic and the making of modern fantasy

2024· article· en· W4405222131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical Receptions Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEPICFantasyMeaning (existential)ArtLiteraturePhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The faun Mr. Tumnus in C. S. Lewis’s The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe evokes a layering of pasts that both Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien identify in their scholarly work as a key characteristic of Virgil’s Aeneid and of classical epic more generally. Tolkien discusses the epic layering of pasts as a shared feature of both Beowulf and the Aeneid, and he describes in letters his adoption of the literary technique of those poems in his fiction. Lewis treats the temporality of the Aeneid as a revolution in epic poetry in his Preface to Paradise Lost, and he less explicitly uses it in his Chronicles of Narnia. Fauns in Latin poetry are not simply Roman versions of Greek satyrs, but they represent a version of the same layering of pasts in epic that Lewis and Tolkien identify. By introducing both Lucy Pevensie and readers to Narnia with a faun, Lewis characterizes Narnia not only as a magical realm but also as an epic one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it