Communication-Efficient Network Topology in Decentralized Learning: A Joint Design of Consensus Matrix and Resource Allocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In decentralized machine learning over a network of workers, each worker updates its local model as a weighted average of its local model and all models received from its neighbors. Efficient consensus weight matrix design and communication resource allocation can increase the training convergence rate and reduce the wall-clock training time. In this paper, we jointly consider these two factors and propose a novel algorithm termed Communication-Efficient Network Topology (CENT), which reduces the latency in each training iteration by removing unnecessary communication links. CENT enforces communication graph sparsity by iteratively updating, with a fixed step size, a trade-off factor between the convergence factor and a weighted graph sparsity. We further extend CENT to one with an adaptive step size (CENT-A), which adjusts the trade-off factor based on the feedback of the objective function value, without introducing additional computation complexity. We show that both CENT and CENT-A preserve the training convergence rate while avoiding the selection of poor communication links. Numerical studies with real-world machine learning data in both homogeneous and heterogeneous scenarios demonstrate the efficacy of CENT and CENT-A and their performance advantage over state-of-the-art algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".