Cognitive Picture of LIE in Contemporary Polish Discourse: A Comprehensive Analysis of Textual Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the research based on semantic and ethnolinguistic analysis, aiming to reconstruct the conceptual structure of lie in contemporary polish texts. this includes a detailed study of the concept not only as a linguistic unit with its lexicographic meaning, but, above all, as a linguisticcultural category, focusing on its semantic and axiological content. empirical data were sourced from the main corpora of contemporary polish texts, as well as directly from press and internet sources. the research revealed the main perspectives from which lie is observed in polish texts, resulting in several distinguished profiles: the axiological profile, viewing lie as a breach of morality; the political-ideological profile, manifested in historical, political and juridical points of view; the psycho-social profile, observed through pragmatic and altruistic points of view; the artistic profile, where lying is understood as the integral part of visual and performing arts; and the economic-advertising profile, depicting lying as an inherent part of marketing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it