MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405260247 · doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2024.103116

Machine learning approach to balance heat transfer and pressure loss in a dimpled tube: Generative adversarial networks in computational fluid dynamics

2024· article· en· W4405260247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science and Engineering Progress · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersSharif University of TechnologyYork University
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsHeat transferGenerative grammarTube (container)Computer scienceMechanicsAdversarial systemBalance (ability)Dynamics (music)Artificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringPsychologyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• GANs optimize dimple depth and pitch in heat pipes, balancing heat transfer and pressure loss. • Three distinct GANs-CFD datasets are created, each mixing GAN-generated and original points. • PEC shows deviations up to 15.49% compared to results from CFD simulations alone. • Average errors for dimple depth and pitch in GANs-CFD datasets are 6.1 % and ∼0 %, respectively. • GANs significantly reduce computational time and costs in optimizing heat pipe designs. In heat tubes, dimples enhance heat transfer but also introduce significant pressure loss. This study aims to optimize dimple depth and longitudinal pitch to balance heat transfer efficiency with pressure loss. An innovative machine learning approach using generative adversarial networks (GANs) is applied to identify optimal dimple configurations. GANs were trained on a foundational dataset derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Initially, CFD simulations generated twenty sample data points to form the base dataset. By employing an ensemble learning method, GANs produced ten additional data points. Combining these with ten randomly chosen points from the original dataset resulted in a hybrid dataset called GANs-CFD, containing twenty points. This procedure was repeated three times to create three distinct GANs-CFD datasets. Performance evaluation criteria (PEC) optimization using these datasets showed that the results deviated by a maximum of 15.49 % from those obtained solely through CFD simulations. The average errors for optimized dimple depth and pitch across the three GANs-CFD datasets were 6.1 % and ∼0 %, respectively. These findings demonstrate the potential of GANs to significantly reduce computational time and cost in optimizing pipes for transporting heat in a fluid designs involving complex trade-offs between heat transfer and pressure loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it