MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405260530 · doi:10.7151/dmdico.1249

Optimal feedback control of stochastic systems on Hilbert spaces based on compact sets in the space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators

2024· article· en· W4405260530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscussiones Mathematicae Differential Inclusions Control and Optimization · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
Topicadvanced mathematical theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHilbert spaceRigged Hilbert spacePure mathematicsHilbert manifoldReproducing kernel Hilbert spaceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present necessary and sufficient conditions characterizing compact sets in the spaces of Nuclear and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on Hilbert spaces.Based on these results, we also characterize compact sets in the space of probability measures on separable Hilbert spaces.These results are then used in the study of optimal feedback control theory for stochastic systems.We prove existence of optimal feedback control laws for standard and several nonstandard control problems.Further, we present necessary conditions of optimality and an algorithm and related convergence theorem whereby optimal control laws can be constructed.We present also a result characterizing compact sets in the space of probability measures on separable Hilbert spaces.These results have interesting applications in control theory on infinite dimensional Banach spaces as presented in the last section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it