MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405269953 · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ad9d72

A Stochastic iteratively regularized Gauss–Newton method

2024· article· en· W4405269953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsMathematicsGaussConvergence (economics)Mathematical optimizationNewton's methodInverse problemInverseApplied mathematicsAlgorithmNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work focuses on developing and motivating a stochastic version of a wellknown inverse problem methodology. Specifically, we consider the iteratively regularized Gauss–Newton method, originally proposed by Bakushinskii for infinite-dimensional problems. Recent work have extended this method to handle sequential observations, rather than a single instance of the data, demonstrating notable improvements in reconstruction accuracy. In this paper, we further extend these methods to a stochastic framework through mini-batching, introducing a new algorithm, the stochastic iteratively regularized Gauss–Newton method (SIRGNM). Our algorithm is designed through the use randomized sketching. We provide an analysis for the SIRGNM, which includes a preliminary error decomposition and a convergence analysis, related to the residuals. We provide numerical experiments on a 2D elliptic partial differential equation example. This illustrates the effectiveness of the SIRGNM, through maintaining a similar level of accuracy while reducing on the computational time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it