Artificial intelligence in emergency neuroradiology: Current applications and perspectives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• The applications of artificial intelligence in emergency neuroradiology have substantially expanded in depth and scope in the past few years. • Machine learning and deep learning algorithms are now used in several tasks related to acute ischemic stroke, acute intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysm and arteriovenous malformations. • The application of artificial intelligence in emergency neuroradiology is growing, calling for more development driven by clinical needs, attention to pediatric neuroimaging, and analysis of real-world performance. Emergency neuroradiology provides rapid diagnostic decision-making and guidance for management for a wide range of acute conditions involving the brain, head and neck, and spine. This narrative review aims at providing an up-to-date discussion about the state of the art of applications of artificial intelligence in emergency neuroradiology, which have substantially expanded in depth and scope in the past few years. A detailed analysis of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in several tasks related to acute ischemic stroke involving various imaging modalities, including a description of existing commercial products, is provided. The applications of artificial intelligence in acute intracranial hemorrhage and other vascular pathologies such as intracranial aneurysm and arteriovenous malformation are discussed. Other areas of emergency neuroradiology including infection, fracture, cord compression, and pediatric imaging are further discussed in turn. Based on these discussions, this article offers insight into practical considerations regarding the applications of artificial intelligence in emergency neuroradiology, calling for more development driven by clinical needs, attention to pediatric neuroimaging, and analysis of real-world performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it