MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405318151 · doi:10.1002/0471654507.erfme151

Neural Networks for Microwave Circuits

2024· other· en· W4405318151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveElectronic circuitArtificial neural networkComputer scienceBiological neural networkElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neural networks, also called artificial neural networks (ANNs), are important techniques for performing forward/inverse modeling for microwave active/passive components to enhance a circuit design. With measured or simulated data of microwave devices, ANNs can be trained to learn relevant microwave relationships, which could be otherwise computationally expensive or for which efficient analytical formulas are not available. By training an ANN using data from electromagnetic (EM)/physics simulations, one can use the trained ANN as models for microwave circuits to replace the EM/physics models, which are typically CPU intensive, to significantly accelerate circuit design with EM/physics‐level accuracies. Fundamental concepts of the ANN structure and training, knowledge‐based neural networks, automated model generation, neuro‐transfer function modeling, deep neural network modeling, neural network‐based inverse modeling, and the use for EM/multiphysics design optimizations are described here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it