Forecasting of hospitalizations for COVID-19: A hybrid intelligence approach for Disease X research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the necessity for proactive measures against emerging diseases, epitomized by WHO's “ Disease X.” Among the myriad of indicators tracking COVID-19 progression, the count of hospitalized patients assumes a pivotal role. This metric facilitates timely responses from government agencies, enabling proactive allocation and management of medical resources. Objective In this study, we introduce a novel hybrid intelligent approach, the EMD&LSTM-ARIMA model. Method: This model integrates three techniques: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) to decompose the data into intrinsic mode functions, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network for capturing long-term dependencies and nonlinear relationships, and the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model for handling linear trends and time series forecasting. We verify its high predictive power and utility through training and forecasting COVID-19 hospitalizations in the UK, Canada, Italy, and Japan. Results Our analysis reveals that all forecasted error rates remain below 10%, with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values obtained for these four countries as 2.30%, 3.33%, 1.63%, and 2.89%, respectively. Conclusion Our proposed EMD&LSTM-ARIMA model demonstrates robust forecasting performance, particularly for COVID-19 hospitalization data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".