MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405356570 · doi:10.5539/ijel.v15n1p71

An Introduction to Quantitative Text Analysis for Linguistics: Reproducible Research Using R

2024· article· en· W4405356570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanaa Alqahtani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLinguisticsApplied linguisticsQuantitative analysis (chemistry)Natural language processingChemistryPhilosophyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jerid Francom’s book An Introduction to Quantitative Text Analysis for Linguistics: Reproducible Research Using R is an essential textbook for researchers and students alike, who are exploring quantitative text analysis. This book is designed with beginners in mind, it emphasizes reproducible research, offering a structured approach to text analysis through the programming language R. Spanning five interconnected parts, beginning with foundational concepts like the Data-Information-Knowledge-Insight (DIKI) hierarchy, corpus creation, and data curation, advancing to topics like tokenization, dimensionality reduction, vector space modeling, and hypothesis testing with the {infer} package. This book contains practical exercises alongside detailed explanations that guide readers through the entire process of text analysis, starting from data acquisition to predictive modeling and statistical designs. Computational methods including readability measures, sentiment analysis, semantic modeling, and topic modeling are highlighted within this book, ensuring that readers are equipped to extract meaningful insights from linguistic data. Through the incorporation of Tidyverse tools and additional resources like GitHub repositories, Francom successfully bridges theoretical understanding with hands-on application. Transparency and reproducibility have been prioritized within the text, and meticulous data documentation and open-source methodologies have been meticulously advocated by the author. Although the book is an accessible resource for English-language data, readers might be challenged due to its focus on breadth over depth when their focus might be on seeking advanced exploration or on the other hand for those without basic programming experience. Regardless of this, Francom’s pedagogical approach combines clarity with practical guidance, making this book a valuable resource for students, researchers, and professionals who aim to integrate quantitative methods into their linguistic research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English LinguisticsSame topicComputational and Text Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207