MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405364446 · doi:10.1145/3700434

PyGim : An Efficient Graph Neural Network Library for Real Processing-In-Memory Architectures

2024· article· en· W4405364446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBottleneckParallel computingExploitMemory modelComputer architectureDistributed computingShared memoryEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are emerging models to analyze graph-structure data. GNN execution involves both compute-intensive and memory-intensive kernels. The latter kernels dominate execution time, because they are significantly bottlenecked by data movement between memory and processors. Processing-In-Memory (PIM) systems can alleviate this data movement bottleneck by placing simple processors near or inside to memory arrays. This work investigates the potential of PIM systems to alleviate the data movement bottleneck in GNNs, and introduces PyGim, an efficient and easy-to-use GNN library for real PIM systems. We propose intelligent parallelization techniques for memory-intensive kernels of GNNs tailored for real PIM systems, and develop an easy-to-use Python API for them. PyGim employs a cooperative GNN execution, in which the compute- and memory-intensive kernels are executed in processor-centric and memory-centric computing systems, respectively, to fully exploit the hardware capabilities. PyGim integrates a lightweight autotuner to tune the parallelization strategy of the memory-intensive kernel of GNNs and enable high programming ease. We extensively evaluate PyGim on a real-world PIM system that has 16 PIM DIMMs with 1992 PIM cores connected to a Host CPU. In GNN inference, we demonstrate that it outperforms prior state-of-the-art PIM works by on average 4.38× (up to 7.20×), and state-of-the-art PyTorch running on Host by on average 3.04× (up to 3.44×). PyGim improves energy efficiency by 2.86× (up to 3.68×) and 1.55× (up to 1.75×) over prior PIM and PyTorch Host schemes, respectively. In memory-intensive kernel of GNNs, PyGim provides 11.6× higher resource utilization in PIM system than that of PyTorch library (optimized CUDA implementation) in GPU systems. Our work provides useful recommendations for software, system and hardware designers. PyGim is publicly and freely available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/PyGim facilitate the widespread use of PIM systems in GNNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Software
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablemedium
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it