Open Road to Competition: Media Framing of Social Justice Within Professional Women's Cycling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The creation of women's versions of popular men's cycling races sparked plenty of media attention as women had historically been denied access to these spaces. Since access to these races and subsequent media provides opportunities and benefits for cyclists, the races become potential sites of social justice, underscoring the importance of understanding the media narrative of social justice in women's cycling. Therefore, we analyzed the presence of the five propositions (distributive justice, procedural justice, interactive justice, recognition, care, and repair) of social justice in public spaces in media narratives surrounding the women's Paris-Roubaix and Tour de France. Issues of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice were present in arguments that gatekeepers could not invest in women's cycling without proof of success, as well as in gatekeepers’ reputation of intolerance. Women faced disproportionate burdens due to lack of resources, representing issues of recognition, procedural justice, and distributive justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it