MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405401876 · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103035

Scalable probabilistic deterioration model based on visual inspections and structural attributes from large networks of bridges

2024· article· en· W4405401876 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicScalabilityComputer scienceReliability engineeringData miningArtificial intelligenceEngineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual inspections of large networks of bridges yield millions of data points scattered across thousands of structural elements. Alongside visual inspections, structural attributes such as age, location and traffic load provide contextual information about the deterioration patterns in the network. Leveraging this network-scale data for modeling deterioration is challenging, especially when each structural element has few inspections over a long period of time. Moreover, as new bridge information and inspections are added each year, it is strictly important for deterioration models to be scalable. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a scalable probabilistic approach for modeling deterioration of large networks of bridges. The new framework consists of state-space models (SSM) for modeling the deterioration based on visual inspections and a Bayesian neural network (BNN) that factors-in information about structural attributes. The role of the BNN model is to learn the mapping between the initial distribution of the deterioration speed and the structural attributes of each bridge. The new framework is shown to be computationally efficient and can seamlessly incorporate a large number of structural attributes, which alleviates the need for feature selection. In addition, the proposed framework incorporates a new approach for learning the inspectors’ uncertainty parameters which is shown to provide better generalization. The experiments in this study are based on real data from the network of bridges in the province of Quebec, Canada. • Scalable probabilistic deterioration model for large networks of bridges. • Deterioration modeling is based on visual inspections while considering structural attributes. • A new approach for quantifying the uncertainty associated with each inspector. • Validation analyses on inspection data from the network of bridges in the Quebec province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it