MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405440141 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3518781

A Deep Learning-Based Time-Frequency Scheme for Ship Detection Using HFSWR

2024· article· en· W4405440141 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Time–frequency analysisTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceRadarMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compact High frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) has been widely used in remote sensing of oceanic dynamics and ship targets due to its convenient deployment and low cost. However, when using a constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector, these systems experience performance degradation primarily because of echo nonstationarity. To address this challenge, a deep learning (DL)-based scheme tailored for identifying ship targets in the time-frequency (TF) domain is presented. To ensure high-quality model training, we develop a semiautomatic annotation approach that uses automatic identification system (AIS) information as a reference and collect a TF dataset named HFSWR-TFD. In addition, inspired by the dynamic snake convolution and triplet attention mechanism, an improved YOLOv5s model named DS-YOLOv5s is designed to effectively capture target ridges. The inference results are filtered using a confidence threshold and then transformed into the range-Doppler domain for final target identification. Experimental results on the newly collected dataset show significant improvements are achieved by DS-YOLOv5s. Compared to its baseline, the DS-YOLOv5s can increase the F1 score by 15.3%, and AP75 by 6.3%. Then, this pretrained DL model is integrated into the entire scheme to make comparison with existing CFAR detectors. With the AIS records as ground truth, our scheme achieves a match rate that is 2.27<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim$</tex-math></inline-formula>8.17% greater than its CFAR counterparts. Moreover, the quantitative results of the associate tracks further confirm the superiority of the proposed method. In conclusion, the proposed scheme provides an effective and efficient solution for HFSWR ship detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it