MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405460316 · doi:10.70645/3078-3437.1016

An Integrated Decision-Making Framework for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Redesign Problem

2024· article· en· W4405460316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAUIQ technical engineering science. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainClosed loopLoop (graph theory)Computer scienceSupply chain networkProcess managementSupply chain managementControl engineeringOperations managementOperations researchEngineeringBusinessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth in demand and environmental concerns in industries like glass manufacturing necessitate the redesign of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) networks to address both operational inefficiencies and sustainability challenges. Unlike conventional supply chain design, redesigning CLSC networks involves strategic decisions such as opening new facilities, closing existing ones, and managing the cost trade-offs associated with these transitions. Motivated by these challenges, this paper proposes an integrated decision-making framework to tackle the closed-loop supply chain network redesign (CLSCNR) problem. The proposed framework is formulated as a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model, specifically tailored for the glass industry. The forward supply chain includes suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and customers, while the reverse supply chain comprises collection centers that allocate returned and waste products to recycling, remanufacturing, or disposal centers. This redesign approach addresses critical challenges in facility location, capacity planning, and customer assignment to better align supply chain operations with increasing demand and sustainability goals. Extensive numerical analyses were conducted using 16 test instances, revealing significant improvements through network redesign. For example, the number of open centers decreased by 1 in several instances (such as T5 and T9), while in other instances, up to 3 centers were closed (e.g., T13). The difference in the number of open centers before and after the redesign highlights the ability of the proposed framework to streamline network operations while maintaining service levels. The computational time ranged from 27.48 seconds for smaller instances to 62.26 seconds for larger ones, demonstrating the model's efficiency and scalability. The findings demonstrate the proposed MIP's ability to optimize network configurations, enhancing operational efficiency and demand satisfaction. These insights provide a practical decision-support tool for supply chain designers, enabling companies in high-demand industries to achieve adaptive and sustainable CLSC networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it