MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405616994 · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126213

A bi-objective data-driven chance-constrained optimization for sustainable urban medical waste management

2024· article· en· W4405616994 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiahong Zhao, Jianfeng Chen, Ginger Y. Ke, Zhiwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Systems with Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMulti-objective optimizationMathematical optimizationRisk analysis (engineering)Machine learningBusinessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The processing and transportation of medical waste pose uncertain threats to the surrounding people and the environment in urban road networks. This paper aims to mitigate such risks under an emergency system with uncertain response times. In more detail, we first formulate an integrated pollution-population risk assessment that estimates the dynamic impact on the exposed population by embedding the emergency response time into the risk measure. Given the variability in traffic conditions, the response time is uncertain, which also affects the associated risks. Taking this randomness into consideration, a bi-objective chance-constrained model is developed to seek optimal facility locations, vehicle acquisitions, as well as route and tour plans, such that both the risk and cost are simultaneously minimized. To meet practical restrictions on medical waste collection, continuously accumulative vehicle load and volume constraints are added to the two-commodity flow formulation. Then, we propose a comprehensive solution procedure that integrates a Back Propagation Neural Network approach within the fuzzy chance constraint framework to address uncertainties. Two multi-objective methods, an augmented ɛ -constraint solution technique and a nearest-neighbor Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) algorithm, are implemented respectively for small- and large-scale problem instances. A series of numerical experiments are conducted on a real-life situation in Shanghai city of China to demonstrate the workability of the proposed model and approach. The numerical results show that our recommended system can effectively prevent the overall capacity shortage, reduce the total cost and risk respectively by more than 8% and 11%, as well as lower the transportation risk and distance respectively by nearly 15% and 23%. • Urban medical waste management is studied under uncertain emergency response time. • An integrated pollution-population measure is proposed to estimate dynamic risks. • Vehicle load and volume constraints are improved in two-commodity flow formulation. • BPNN is integrated with fuzzy chance constraints to model uncertainties. • A nearest-neighbor NSGA-II algorithm is proposed for solving large instances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Systems with ApplicationsSame topicHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207