Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tras la resaca de más de 40 años de dictadura franquista, Iván Zulueta “irrumpe” en el panorama cinematográfico español con una obra tan inclasificable como vanguardista: Arrebato (1979). Se trataba de un filme tremendamente rupturista, tanto en el abordaje de las temáticas tratadas (drogas, sexo, y esmerada renovación de la tradición vampírica) como en su valiente concesión a la experimentación sonora y visual tomada del cine underground neoyorkino y barcelonés de los años 60 y 70. Pero, Arrebato, fue, ante todo, un filme autobiográfico, autorreferencial y visionario. Zulueta y Arrebato convergen y se entreveran en un mismo e inequívoco relato de fantaterror. El presente artículo despeja las claves interpretativas de esta relación siamesa entre el autor y su única obra testamentaria, aportando nuevas apreciaciones sobre una de las películas más singulares del catálogo fílmico español.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".