MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The areas of cybercrime prevention and improvement of legal regulation of human rights protection in cyberspace

2024· article· en· W4405699412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical and Comparative Jurisprudence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUkrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberspaceCybercrimeContext (archaeology)LegislationHuman rightsThe InternetInternet privacyData Protection Act 1998Political scienceComputer securityBusinessLawPublic relationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted at identifying the main problems of human rights protection in cyberspace and developing modern and effective ways to improve legal regulation, increase the level of protection of users on the Internet and strengthen public confidence in the digital environment. The author analyzes and proposes ways to prevent cybercrime, one of the most serious problems of modern cyberspace, especially in the context of constant cyberattacks. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of current threats and problems related to human rights violations in cyberspace in the context of constant cyberattacks, which have significantly intensified after the full-scale invasion of russia. First of all, the authors analyzed the main national andinternationallegal acts regulating the protection of human rights in cyberspace. It is found that the existing legal framework governing Ukraine is somewhat irrelevant in the current environment, as it does not fully cover new threats arising from the development of information technologies. Motivated proposals were made to amend the current national legislation of Ukraine to improve the mechanisms for protecting human rights in cyberspace. The authors also raised the issue of personal data protection, in particular, analyzed the concept of the «right to be forgotten», which is particularly relevant in the context of the rapid dissemination of information on the Internet. The problems of protecting children’s rights in cyberspace, including such phenomena as cyberbullying, grooming and excessive exposure to violent content, are separately considered. The article emphasizes the importance of introducing special protection measures for children, in particular, by strengthening control over access to dangerous web resources, as well as intensifying efforts to raise awareness of parents and educators about threats in the digital space. The authors also analyzed measures of legal liability for cyberbullying in the United States and Canada. In addition, the article regulates in detail and substantiates the feasibility of developing a Strategy for Information Security of Children in Cyberspace and a Strategy for Digital Citizenship. The authors emphasize the need to introduce the institution of property liability for cyberbullying in Ukraine. The article concludes that a comprehensive approach to improving the legal regulation of cyberspace is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it