Impact of Canadian wildfires on aerosol and ice clouds in the early-autumn Arctic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud particle phase is an important controlling factor for the Earth's surface heat budget, through the radiative balance. Thus, it exerts a strong influence on climate change in the Arctic. Aerosols transported from lower latitudes modify Arctic cloud properties, including cloud phase. In this study, we investigated ice cloud formation and high aerosol concentrations over the Arctic Ocean using a combination of observations obtained by an Arctic voyage, reanalysis data, and backward trajectory analyses. On 12 September 2023, in an atmospheric river over the Arctic Ocean, ice clouds at temperatures warmer than −15 °C were observed in the middle troposphere by a Cloud Particle Sensor sonde. In the lower troposphere, a particle counter onboard a drone detected particle counts two orders of magnitude higher than the voyage average. Backward trajectories indicated that a lower tropospheric air mass with a high concentration of organic carbon (OC) aerosols over northern and coastal western Canada, where wildfire-induced OC emissions were evident, reached the mid-troposphere over the Arctic Ocean. These results suggest that OC aerosols from severe Canadian wildfires in the summer of 2023 acted as ice-nucleating particles for ice cloud formation under high-temperature conditions exceeding −15 °C over the Arctic Ocean. • Vertical profiling of clouds and aerosols was conducted in the Arctic Ocean in 2023. • A particle counter on a drone recorded high-aerosol-concentration events. • Canadian wildfire aerosols would influence the Arctic ice cloud formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it