MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405795758 · doi:10.1080/14631369.2024.2446367

Letters from Mio: Japanese Canadian correspondence to Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada during and after World War II

2024· article· en· W4405795758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Ethnicity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld War IIAncient historyGeographyPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistoryEthnologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1942, Japanese Canadians living in coastal British Columbia, Canada were forced to relocate. Once World War II ended, they were not permitted to return to their homes on the coast. This paper relates to the correspondence between two Japanese Canadian women and a white Canadian woman who lived in Nanaimo, B.C. The first letters were written in 1942, and they continued writing letters after resettling to Mio-Mura, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan in 1946. This paper summarizes the contents of 47 letters sent to Nanaimo from these two women, of which 19 were sent from Canada, and the other 28 were sent from Mio. The letters provide insights into how attached Japanese Canadians were to Nanaimo, and they demonstrate the degree to which some first-generation immigrants from Japan were able to maintain positive relationships with white Canadians, despite having significant cultural and linguistic differences and experiencing structural racism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it