MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation of 3D turbulent flows using a discretized generative model physics-informed neural networks

2024· article· en· W4405801561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceDiscretizationGenerative grammarArtificial neural networkStatistical physicsPhysicsGenerative modelComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) demonstrated efficacy in approximating partial differential equations (PDEs). However, challenges arise when dealing with high-dimensional PDEs, particularly when characterized by nonlinear and chaotic behavior, such as turbulent fluid flows. We introduce a novel methodology that integrates domain discretization , a generative model in the Sobolev function space ( H 1 ), and a gating mechanism to effectively simulate high dimensional problems. The effectiveness of the method, Discretized Generative Model Physics-Informed Neural Networks (DG-PINN), is validated by its application to the simulation of a time-dependent 3D turbulent channel flow governed by the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, a less explored problem in the existing literature. Domain discretization prevents error propagation by using different neural network models in different subdomains . The absence of initial conditions (IC) in subsequent time steps presents a challenge in identifying optimal network parameters. To address this, discretized generative models are used, improving the model’s overall performance. The global solutions’ regularity is enhanced compared to previous decomposition techniques by using the H 1 norm of error, rather than L 2 . The effectiveness of the DG-PINN is validated through numerical test cases and compared against baseline PINNs and traditional domain decomposition PINNs. The DG-PINN demonstrates improvement in both approximation accuracy and computational efficiency, consistently maintaining accuracy even at later time instances. Moreover, the implementation of a distributed training strategy, facilitated by domain discretization, is discussed, resulting in improved convergence rates and more optimized memory usage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it