MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405812117 · doi:10.1109/tia.2024.3522875

Second Harmonic-Based Approach to Identify a GIC Flow in Power Transformers

2024· article· en· W4405812117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsEnergie NB Power (Canada)University of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower flowElectrical engineeringTransformerElectronic engineeringPower system harmonicsHarmonic analysisComputer scienceEngineeringTotal harmonic distortionVoltagePhysicsPower (physics)Electric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Certain parts of the world can experience active geomagnetic disturbances, which trigger the flow of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) through grounding circuits into power systems. Such currents are quasi-dc currents that can have large magnitudes capable of inflecting damage to power system equipment. Power transformers are among the vulnerable equipment to GIC flows, which can cause harmonic distortion, disruption in reactive power flow, and thermal damage in transformer windings. Adverse effects of GIC flows can be minimized by developing a fast, accurate, and reliable detection method of GICs. Such a detection method can support initiating adequate responses to block the GIC from flowing into power transformers. This paper presents the development and implementation of a method to detect GIC flows in power transformers. The developed method is based on extracting the second harmonic present in the differential currents. The proposed GIC detection is experimentally tested using laboratory <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3\phi$</tex-math></inline-formula> transformers, when operated for different GIC flows and loading levels. In addition, experimental tests are conducted for magnetizing inrush currents and various faults in both sides of tested transformers. Test results demonstrate fast and accurate detection of GIC flows with minor sensitivity to the value of the GIC, loading level, and/or transformer core type. In addition, the proposed <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2{\text{nd}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> harmonic-based method is found able to accurately distinguish GIC flows from magnetizing inrush and fault currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it