MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405843806 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112984

A fuzzy logic approach within the DPSIR framework to address the inherent uncertainty and complexity of water security assessments

2024· article· en· W4405843806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMinistry of EducationMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDPSIRFuzzy logicComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementBusinessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A fuzzy logic evaluation model is established to deal with the uncertainty. • The control rules are set up to reflect the influence of relationships. • A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the indicators of the evaluation system. • The water security of MRB is at a safe status and faces various challenges. Quantitative and qualitative assessments are crucial means to understand the status of water security. In this paper, an index system for evaluating and diagnosing water security in the Mekong River Basin (MRB) was constructed based on the DPSIR model. A fuzzy logic evaluation model is established to deal with the nonlinearity and uncertainty of the evaluation index. In addition, the control rules of fuzzy reasoning are set up to reflect the influence relationship between evaluation indexes. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the evaluation method is reported and ways for water security improvement are proposed. The main findings are: (1) The water security score of MRB is 65.034 which is considered to be a safe status. China, Laos, and Thailand are water secure, while Myanmar, Cambodia, and Vietnam are facing water security problems. (2) The growth of Driving forces (D) and Impacts (I) are related to the improvement of water security. Pressures (P) have a significant threshold effect on water security. States (S) improvement has a direct and sensitive promotional effect. Responses (R) and water security are positively correlated. (3) The driving force has the strongest positive impact on water security in Laos, while it has a negative impact on Vietnam. Pressures has a minimal impact on China’s water security, while Cambodia faces a larger impact from Pressures. The influence of the State on the water security of basin countries is relatively stable, but in Myanmar, it has a negative impact. The effects of environmental changes hurt China’s water security. Vietnam has room to reduce these effects and enhance water security. The response dimension significantly improves the water security of the riparian countries but has a lesser impact on Cambodia and Myanmar. This research underscores the superiority of fuzzy logic in addressing multi-indicator, non-linear, and complex issues. It provides a flexible framework that accommodates the inherent uncertainties and complexities of water security assessments, captures dynamic interactions between various components of water security, and reveals non-linear relationships and threshold effects that conventional methods might overlook.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it