MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of fabrication method on the corrosion behavior of heat-treated nickel aluminum bronze (NAB) alloy: A comparison of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and laser directed energy deposition (L-DED) techniques

2024· article· en· W4405869048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueColloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgy and Material Science
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlloyFabricationMetallurgyLaserBronzeCorrosionFusionDeposition (geology)NickelAluminiumOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The corrosion response of heat-treated C63020-NAB alloys fabricated through laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) techniques was assessed in NaCl solution on surfaces parallel and perpendicular to their building direction. Microstructural analyses revealed a stronger texture formed in the L-PBF NAB, while the L-DED NAB exhibited a slightly more isotropic behavior characterized by a finer microstructure and more equiaxed grains on both surfaces. Corrosion performance analysis indicated isotropic corrosion behavior in both L-DED and L-PBF NAB, though the L-DED NAB showed marginally better corrosion resistance. The microstructural characteristics were identified as the primary factor driving the passivity and corrosion resistance of the alloy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it