An investigation of ensemble learning techniques for obesity risk prediction using lifestyle data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obesity disease is a significant health issue and has affected millions of people worldwide. Identifying underlying reasons for the onset of obesity risk in its early stage has become challenging for medical practitioners. The growing volume of lifestyle data related to obesity has made it imperative to employ effective machine-learning algorithms that can gather insights from the underlying data trends and identify critical patient conditions. In this study, an ensemble learning approach including boosting, bagging, and voting techniques was used for obesity risk prediction based on lifestyle dataset. Specifically, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, and CatBoost models are used for boosting, Bagged Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Extra Tree models are used for bagging, and Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machine models are used for voting. Different preprocessing steps were employed to improve the quality assessment of the data. Hyperparameter tuning and feature selection and ranking are also used to achieve better prediction results. The considered models are extensively evaluated and compared using various metrics. Among all the models, XGBoost performed better with an accuracy of 98.10%, precision and recall of 97.50%, f1-score of 96.50%, and AUC-ROC of 100%, respectively. Additionally, weight, height, and age features were identified and ranked as the most significant predictors using the recursive feature elimination method for obesity risk prediction. Our proposed model can be used in the healthcare industry to support healthcare providers in better predicting and detecting multiple stages of obesity diseases. • Exploratory data analysis is performed to prepare the dataset for better experimental usability. • Nine algorithms using boosting, bagging, and voting, enhance classifier diversity for obesity risk prediction. • Hyperparameter tuning using grid search selects the best parameters for training ensemble learning models. • Model performances were validated using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. • The proposed XGB model showed better results compared to other recent research works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it