MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405926267 · doi:10.5206/mt.v4i4.21827

The Challenge of the Characteristic height of Bohemian Matrices: experiments with Maple and open problems

2024· article· en· W4405926267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaple Transactions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsMapleMathematicsBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A family of Bohemian matrices is a set of matrices where the entries are independently sampled from a finite set, usually integers, of bounded height. Such families arise in many applications (e.g. compressed sensing) and the properties of matrices selected "at random" from such families are of practical and mathematical interest. Studying such matrices leads to many unanswered questions. In this paper, we state a new problem arising from the results obtained in a previous work concerning the maximal height of the characteristic polynomials of this family. We present a challenge with a computational flavour. More precisely, we describe, and illustrate by means of some experiments—executed with Maple—the problem of analyzing the behaviour of the set of heights, not only the maximal, of the characteristic polynomials of a family of upper Hessenberg Toeplitz structured Bohemian matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it