Beyond Single-User Scheduling: Exploiting Massive MIMO for Concurrent Data Delivery With Minimum Age of Information
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the emergence of real-time applications, modern wireless networks have witnessed the use of Age of Information (AoI) as a critical metric for evaluating the timeliness of data delivery. This paper considers multi-user scheduling, extending beyond traditional single-user scheduling, to exploit the potential of Massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (mMIMO) systems for concurrent data delivery over imperfectly known channel state information (CSI). We propose a novel transmission scheduling framework that leverages the spatial multiplexing capabilities of mMIMO to minimize the AoI across multiple users. This results in a joint optimization of multi-user scheduling and power allocation problem for optimum data freshness in a wireless broadcast network. We handle the non-convexity of the resulting problem by utilizing successive convex approximation to specifically reformulate the binary/integer and non-convex constraints of the problem. Extensive simulations demonstrate superior performance of the proposed framework and its solution in terms of AoI compared to existing benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it