MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406006444 · doi:10.1088/2515-7655/ada4dd

Achieving 32.9% efficiency in Pb-Based quantum dot solar cells via SCAPS-1D simulation optimization

2025· article· en· W4406006444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum dotOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study presents a comprehensive investigation and in-depth analysis of the optimization of Pb-based quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs), concentrating on the influences of doping concentration, absorber layer thickness, defect density, temperature, and resistive elements. We systematically examined three absorber materials: lead sulfide (PbS), tetrabutylammonium iodide-treated PbS (PbS-TBAI), and lead selenide (PbSe) quantum dots (QDs). Optimal doping concentrations of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>17</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> cm −3 for PbS and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>22</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> cm −3 for both PbS-TBAI and PbSe were identified. Our findings reveal that precise control of these parameters can significantly enhance power conversion efficiency (PCE), achieving values of 24.6%, 28%, and 26.2% for PbS, PbS-TBAI, and PbSe, respectively. Additionally, we investigated the impact of absorber layer thickness on device performance. We discovered that a 1 µ m thickness for PbS yields a maximum PCE of 32.9% due to balanced photon absorption and reduced Shockley–Read–Hall recombination. Conversely, PbSe’s performance declined with increased thickness because of its layer-dependent bandgap. We found that lower defect densities ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> cm −3 ) critically improve PCE and fill factor across all materials. The temperature-dependent studies demonstrated that PbS-TBAI exhibits remarkable resilience, maintaining efficiency under thermal stress due to effective surface passivation. Analyses of series and shunt resistances highlighted the importance of minimizing internal resistances to optimize device performance. The proposed device structure comprises a fluorine-doped tin oxide front contact layer, a silver sulfide (Ag 2 S) electron transport layer, the QD absorber layer (PbS, PbS-TBAI, or PbSe), and copper(I) oxide (Cu 2 O) hole transport layer. Utilizing cascade band alignment, we achieved a record PCE of 32.9%. This research highlights the significant potential of Pb-based QDSCs for achieving high efficiencies through promising material and structural optimization, positioning them as competitive candidates for next-generation solar technologies. The results provide a valuable understanding of designing high-performance QDSCs, paving the way for their integration into sustainable energy solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it