MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406033644 · doi:10.1287/opre.2021.0445

Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback

2025· article· en· W4406033644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegretMonotone polygonComputer scienceMathematical optimizationOnline learningMathematical economicsOperations researchMathematicsMultimediaMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback Curious about how players can learn and adapt in unknown games without knowing the game’s dynamics? In “Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback,” Ba, Lin, Zhang, and Zhou present a novel bandit learning algorithm for no-regret learning in games where each player only observes its reward determined by all players’ current joint action, not its gradient. Focusing on smooth and strongly monotone games, they introduce a bandit learning algorithm using self-concordant barrier functions. This algorithm achieves optimal single-agent regret and optimal last-iterate convergence rate in multiagent learning to the Nash equilibrium. Their work significantly improves previous methods and demonstrates the algorithm’s effectiveness through numerical results in various applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it