MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406070271 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.102995

Improving daily reference evapotranspiration forecasts: Designing AI-enabled recurrent neural networks based long short-term memory

2025· article· en· W4406070271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsLong short term memoryTerm (time)EvapotranspirationComputer scienceArtificial neural networkRecurrent neural networkArtificial intelligenceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) plays a significant role in numerous environmental and agricultural applications. It aids in optimizing agricultural practices, enhancing drought resilience, supporting environmental conservation efforts, and providing critical data for research. By leveraging advanced technologies and accurate modeling techniques, stakeholders can make informed decisions that promote sustainability and resilience in the face of changing climatic conditions. The main purpose of this investigation was to forecast the daily ETo trends at Melbourne and Sydney stations in Australia, where several cutting-edge machine learning methodologies were employed. The modeling approach encompassed the implementation of Neural Network (NN), Deep Learning (DL), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), RNN based Long Short-Term Memory (RNN-LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Network based LSTM (CNN-LSTM) to forecast daily ETo using historical meteorology data. During the model development stage, the optimal variables were determined successfully via heatmaps for precise assessment of ETo in both stations. The predictive models were built by incorporating both the training subset (80 %, covering the years 2009 to 2020) and the testing subset (20 %, ranging from 2021 to 2024) independently to forecast ETo. The results confirmed that the RNN-LSTM attained higher prediction accuracy as compared to NN, DL, RNN, and CNN-LSTM models. Conversely, based on the visual representations and assessments, one can grasp the significant resemblance between the forecasts of the RNN-LSTM model and the actual data. By combining RNNs with LSTM units, models can leverage the strengths of both approaches to improve their ability to process sequential data effectively. This integration allows for better capturing of both short-term and long-term dependencies in the input sequences. Upon careful evaluation, it became clear that the error values associated with the RNN-LSTM models were negligible at the designated stations during the testing phase, with an RMSE of 0.0011 mm for Melbourne, and 0.022 mm for Sydney, followed by RNN, DL, and NN respectively. The proposed modeling approach can be beneficial in monitoring and managing water and crop planning which relies on precise ETo predictions. • Reference evapotranspiration predictions plays a significant role in environmental and agricultural applications. • Novel cutting-edge deep learning methodology was designed to forecast the daily trends in Reference evapotranspiration. • The Recurrent Neural Networks based Long Short-Term Memory (RNN-LSTM) model was constructed. • The proposed model is evaluated in Melbourne and Sydney stations, Australia as a reliable decision-support system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it