MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406075194 · doi:10.70792/jngr5.0.v1i2.72

Generative AI Unlocking Adaptive Workflow Design

2025· article· en· W4406075194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Next-Generation Research 5 0 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Process Automation Applications
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowComputer scienceAutomationBusiness processGenerative grammarWorkflow technologySoftware engineeringProcess managementArtificial intelligenceEngineeringDatabaseWork in process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel application of generative AI models to enterprise workflow automation, emphasizing adaptive process design and continuous improvement. By utilizing transformer-based models like GPT for real-time decision-making, the framework empowers workflows to self-optimize based on operational data and evolving business needs. The proposed system integrates Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with generative AI to dynamically suggest process improvements, reducing design time and human intervention. A case study in the e-commerce sector showcases the system's ability to adapt order fulfillment workflows, achieving a 35% reduction in processing time while enhancing customer satisfaction. This research establishes generative AI as a transformative tool for intelligent and adaptive workflow automation, offering unprecedented flexibility and efficiency in enterprise environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it