MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406191003 · doi:10.3390/soilsystems9010003

Predicting Soil Salinity Based on Soil/Water Extracts in a Semi-Arid Region of Morocco

2025· article· en· W4406191003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Land Suitability Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversité Mohammed VI Polytechnique
KeywordsAridSoil salinitySalinityEnvironmental scienceSoil waterSoil scienceHydrology (agriculture)AgroforestryWater resource managementGeographyGeologyOceanographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil salinity is a major constraint to soil health and crop productivity, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The most accurate measurement of soil salinity is considered to be the electrical conductivity of saturated soil extracts (ECe). Because this method is labor-intensive, it is unsuitable for routine analysis in large soil sampling campaigns. This study aimed to identify the best models to estimate soil salinity based on ECe in relation to a rapid electrical conductivity (EC) measurement in soil/water (referred to as S:W henceforward) extracts. We evaluated the relationship between ECe and the ECS:W extract ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:5) in salt-affected soils from the semi-arid Sehb El Masjoune region of Morocco. The soil salinity in this region is 0.5 to 235 dS/m, as determined by the ECe method. A total of 125 soil samples, from topsoil (0–15 cm) and subsoil (15–30 cm) with mainly fine to medium textures, were analyzed using linear, logarithmic, and second-order polynomial regression models. The models included all samples or grouped samples according to soil texture (fine, medium) or specific textural classes. The mean ECe values were 2.6, 3.1, and 7.9 times greater than the EC of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:5 S:W extracts, respectively. Polynomial regression models had the best predictive accuracy, R2 = 0.98, and the lowest root mean square error of 10.6 to 10.7 dS/m for the ECS:W extract ratios of 1:5 and 1:2. The polynomial models could represent the non-linear relationships between ECe and salinity indicators, especially in the 80–170 dS/m salinity range, where other models typically underestimate the salinity. These results confirm that advanced regression techniques are suitable for predicting soil salinity in a salt-affected semi-arid region. The site-specific models outperformed previously published models, because they consider the spatial variability and heterogeneity of the salinity in the study area explicitly. This confirms the importance of calibrating soil salinity models according to the local soil and environmental conditions. Consequently, we can undertake soil salinity assessments in hundreds of samples by using the simple, rapid ECS:W extraction method as a direct indicator of EC and extrapolate to ECe with a polynomial regression model. Our approach enables the widespread soil salinity assessments that are needed for land-use planning, irrigation management, and crop selection in salt-affected landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it