MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406224872 · doi:10.1002/alz.090025

Assessment improved of cognitive impairment with artificial intelligence in the user‐web‐mobile application

2024· article· en· W4406224872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive impairmentComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCognitionHuman–computer interactionPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The World Health Organization forecasts a population of 2,000 million people over 60 years by the year 2050, with 7% of this population suffering from dementia. Making a constant clinical‐technological evaluation of older adults allows early detection of the disease and provides a better quality of life for the patient. In this sense, the research and development of innovative technological systems for the early detection of the disease, its monitoring and management of the growing number of patients with cognitive diseases has increased in recent years, integrating data collection and its automatic processing based on geriatric metrics into these systems using artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Method This research presents an interactive web platform that allows users with any intelligent device with internet access, to remotely perform an automated assessment of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. We use AI and neural network methods for binary and multiclass classification to obtain assessment scores according to geriatric metrics. The application provides an automated evaluation of the MoCA test, which can then be validated remotely by a mental health specialist. Result The tests performed show a correct correspondence in the handling of the information and results of each MoCA item with respect to the database. For the test database evaluated with the application, results are obtained with 100% accuracy and equal to the evaluations performed by specialists. Conclusion This automated assessment provides great help to the medical specialist in the process of detection and evaluation of cognitive impairment, significantly improving the quality of healthcare. The management and organization for the follow‐up of the patient’s cognitive impairment is done through the information of the tests performed, their evaluation and the clinical history of each patient. This information is consulted and managed by the doctor for the patient’s follow‐up; the caregiver/family member has access to tests performed, their evaluation and all the follow‐up that the doctor gives to the patient. The interface was developed thinking in the elderly. It is intuitive, with the relevant information and graphic elements, the procedure for using the application is explained step‐by‐step, the colors used are comfortable for eye care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it